Home Site Map Contact Us

HPS Leadership Best Practices Journal™

Building Strength-based Leaders, Teams, and Organizations

www.hp-strategies.com
The Journal for CEOs and Other Senior Leaders Who Want
to Perform at Their BEST and Inspire the BEST in Their People

HPS Archived Journal
Publications

 

Subscribe to CEO Leadership
Best Practices Journal™ Now

 

Download a free copy of
Emotional Intelligence:
An Executive Handbook

Leadership Development and ROI

 
Larry Fehd

Larry Fehd is CEO and founder of Human Performance Strategies, LLC. Please see bio for professional background and experience.

Contact Information
Phone: 512-415-0748
Email: lfehd@hp-strategies.com
   

Have you ever wondered why business section bookshelves are packed with volumes of the latest theory or technique for leadership development? How many books, articles, or seminars, among other learning forums, have you pursued in a quest for improving your own leadership skills and developing other leaders within your organization? Don't worry, you are not alone. However, being in the majority doesn't necessarily mean we fully appreciate the impact of effective leadership on business performance.

Since leaders are always learning, we depend on and value the many fine resources available on leadership development. And there is a lot of compelling research data to substantiate significant returns on investment for various leadership development initiatives. However, rather than discuss redundant information, let's change the topic from "return on investment" to "cost of ineffective leadership." A review of this subject will likely yield some very different conclusions. Some common consequences of ineffective leadership help put its cost into perspective:

  • Reduced productivity
  • Underutilized human resources
  • Wasted time and rework
  • Low trust and team morale
  • Stifling of innovation and creativity
  • Attrition of key talent
  • Customer dissatisfaction
  • Quality nonconformances
  • Unresolved conflicts
  • Lack of collaboration
  • Etc., etc., etc….

Referring back to the bookshelves image, it's interesting how many variations and approaches to leadership development exist and yet the desired result remains the same, i.e. to improve leadership effectiveness and organizational performance. Business leaders often tell us that they are sometimes confused and overwhelmed in trying to identify and select the best approach for leadership development within their organization. Designing and facilitating a process like leadership development in a "need it now" world is a challenging proposition. It's as if we are trying to facilitate a process but using an event mentality.

Earlier this year, we introduced the concept of the HPS Mobile Enterprise™ in an article by the same title. When you think about it, a mobile can be an excellent metaphor representing a business enterprise. A mobile often contains many parts and each part is interconnected and interdependent — at least to some extent — and subject to constant change and external environmental influences. Since the mobile is constantly changing, exemplary leaders must be agile and respond quickly and appropriately when necessary. Exemplary leaders must also fully leverage and effectively deploy resources to ensure all parts of the mobile are fully optimized. Exemplary leaders are very deliberate in their actions and take time to carefully consider how their actions will impact individuals, teams, the organization, and all other key stakeholders.

Leadership development is a process and not an event. The difference between average and exemplary leadership is remarkable in terms of team and organizational performance. In today's limited resources environment coupled with intense market competition, improving leadership effectiveness is both an investment and insurance policy, preventing the negative consequences of ineffective leadership.

In the final analysis when you consider the return on investment of developing ourselves and others into exemplary leaders, the important question seems to be whether CEOs, presidents, and other senior leaders can afford NOT to improve their leadership skills and those of all other leaders within their organization.